Multi-tenant governance. Customer-isolated by design.

For B2B SaaS engineering organizations scaling AI-built software across tenants, teams, and customer audits.

Talk to sales

The regulatory frame

SOC 2, ISO, and inherited obligations.

SOC 2

Security, availability, and change-management controls your customers audit you against.

ISO/IEC 27001 & 42001

Information security and AI management systems.

EU AI Act & customer DPAs

Obligations you inherit from your regulated customers.

How governed development maps to that frame

Vendor due diligence as a one-export answer.

Tenant isolation

Declared as an explicit asset model and enforced, not assumed by convention.

SOC 2 change management

Versioned artifacts and named approvers on every increment.

Customer due diligence

An audit trail you hand over, instead of a security questionnaire you draft from memory.

Regulatory scenario walkthrough

The cross-tenant reporting feature.

Illustrative scenario — not a customer case.

A SaaS company builds an AI-assisted reporting feature shared across tenants. In Architecture, tenant-isolation boundaries are declared as assets; the Quality Gate rejects a generated query missing its tenant scope. The Analyzer records the catch, the fix, and the engineer who signed off.

When an enterprise prospect’s security team runs vendor due diligence and asks how tenant isolation is enforced in AI-generated code, the SaaS company shares the artifact trail — declared isolation assets, the rejected violation, the approved fix, and the named approver. A SOC 2 change-management question becomes a one-export answer.

See expandev applied to your stack.

Tell us about your team and we'll tailor a walkthrough to your stack, your governance needs, and the way you ship.

Talk to sales Book a demo

See full pricing on the pricing page.